nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
AI智读

腾云AI智读

以下回复内容均依据本文提供!

AI导读
* 友情提示:该部分内容由 AI技术自动生成,仅供参考。对于因使用本网站以上内容产生的相关后果,本网站不承担任何商业和法律责任。
* 登录仅用于提升体验和增强功能,不会增加额外使用限制。
“安全-开放”螺旋:海南自贸港综合安全治理体系的演化逻辑与制度创新
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(24FGJB001)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202606.0091
发布时间: 2026-09-02
出版时间: 2026-09-02
网络发布时间: 2026-09-02
移动端阅读
摘要:

海南自贸港全岛封关运作标志着中国制度型开放进入新阶段。如何在高水平开放环境中构建综合安全治理体系、实现“放得开”与“管得住”的动态平衡,成为亟需回应的重大理论命题。现有研究多将安全与开放预设为静态二元对立关系,缺乏对二者动态协同演化的过程性解释。本文提出“安全-开放”螺旋概念,构建“横向机制-纵向演进-深层动力”三维分析框架,采用单案例纵向追踪研究方法将海南自贸港八年建设历程划分为三轮螺旋周期,进行系统性因果机制分析,以揭示高水平开放环境下综合安全治理体系的演化逻辑与制度创新。研究发现,海南自贸港安全治理历经探索奠基、加速整合和封关跃升三轮螺旋,每轮螺旋通过“风险感知-制度调适-能力跃迁”的横向机制运作,受“压力测试-学习反馈-制度固化”深层动力持续驱动;三轮循环遵循螺旋加速、整合递进、制度累积和模式转型四重演化规律,整体呈现正反馈循环上升的演化逻辑。本研究丰富了安全与开放动态协同的理论解释,为高水平开放环境的韧性治理和跨部门协同治理提供借鉴。

Abstract:

The operation of Hainan Free Trade Port's island-wide customs clearance marks a new stage of China's institutional opening.How to build a comprehensive security governance system in a high-level open environment and achieve a dynamic balance between "openness" and "manageable" has become a major theoretical proposition which urgently needs to respond to.However,most of the existing studies presuppose security and openness as static binary oppositions, and divide security issues according to disciplinary barriers,lacking a procedural explanation for the dynamic co-evolution of the two.To this end,this paper proposes and explains the concept of "safety-openness" spiral,constructs a three-dimensional analysis framework of "horizontal mechanism-vertical evolution-deep motivation" and uses a single-case longitudinal tracking research method to divide the eight-year construction process of Hainan Free Trade Port into three spiral cycles, and conducts a systematic causal mechanism analysis to reveal the internal logic and institutional mechanism of the evolution of the comprehensive security governance system in a high-level open environment.The study found that the security governance of Hainan Free Trade Port has undergone a three-wheel spiral of exploration and foundation,accelerated integration and closure,and achieved a step-by-step leap.Each spiral operates through a horizontal mechanism of "risk perception-institutional adjustment-ability transition" and is continuously driven by the deep power of "stress test-learning feedback-institutional solidification".The three rounds of circulation follow the four evolution laws of spiral acceleration,integration and progression,system accumulation and mode transformation.The evolution of the comprehensive security governance system presents the theoretical characteristics of positive feedback cycle spiraling.The research enriches the theoretical explanation of the dynamic synergy between security and openness, and provides practical implications for resilient governance and cross-sectoral collaborative governance in a high-level open environment.

参考文献

[1]于涛,罗来军.海南自由贸易港建设的风险识别与防控[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024,42(2):92-100.

[2]文穗.海南自由贸易港离岸金融风险防范监管制度研究[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021,39(3):82-88.

[3]刘云亮,翁小茜.中国特色自由贸易港授权立法风险防控机制研究[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021,39(5):111-118.

[4]谭波.海南自贸港社会治理、法治制度、风险防控体系的一体化设计[J].今日海南,2020(10):24-26.

[5]RENN O.Risk governance:coping with uncertainty in a complex world[M].London:Earthscan,2008.

[6]VAN ASSELT M B,RENN O.Risk governance[J].Journal of risk research,2011,14(4):431-449.

[7]薛澜,周玲,朱琴.风险治理:完善与提升国家公共安全管理的基石[J].江苏社会科学,2008(6):7-11.

[8]童星,张海波.基于中国问题的灾害管理分析框架[J].中国社会科学,2010(1):132-146.

[9]RENN O,LAUBICHLER M,LUCAS K,et al.Systemic risks from different perspectives[J].Risk analysis,2022(9):1902-1920.

[10]LAWRENCE M,HOMER-DIXON T,JANZWOOD S,et al.Global polycrisis:the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement[J].Global sustainability,2024,7,e6:1-16.

[11]HOLLING C S.Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J].Annual review of ecology and systematics,1973,4:1-23.

[12]唐皇凤,王豪.可控的韧性治理:新时代基层治理现代化的模式选择[J].探索与争鸣,2019(12):53-62.

[13]姜晓萍,李敏.治理韧性:新时代中国社会治理的维度与效度[J].行政论坛,2022,29(3):5-12.

[14]HOLLAND J H.Hidden order:how adaptation builds complexity[M].Reading:Addison-Wesley,1995.

[15]GUNDERSON L H,HOLLING C S.Panarchy:understanding transformations in human and natural systems[M].Washington D C:Island Press,2001.

[16]FOLKE C,HAHN T,OLSSON P,et al.Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems[J].Annual review of environment and resources,2005,30:441-473.

[17]HALL P A.Policy paradigms,social learning,and the state:the case of economic policymaking in Britain[J].Comparative politics,1993,25(3):275-296.

[18]姜秀敏.探索深度参与全球海洋治理的行动方案[N].中国社会科学报,2021-04-15(005).

[19]吴高辉,杨晓婷.统合联营:公共领导力视角下新型农村集体经济发展机理——基于H省H村的单案例研究[J].公共管理学报,2024(3):100-110.

[20]YIN R K.Case study research:design and methods(5th ed)[M].Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage,2014.

[21]PIERSON P.Politics in time:history,institutions,and social analysis[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,2004.

(1)文中所有相关数据统计截至2026年2月16日。

(1)“制度层叠”指新旧制度元素以多种方式嫁接在一起。凯瑟琳·西伦(Kathleen Thelen)在《制度是如何演化的:德国、英国、美国和日本的技能政治经济学》(How Institutions Evolve:The Political Economy of Skills in Germany,Britain,the United States,and Japan,2004)中认为,制度的设计者并不是都从零开始设计一套新的制度,而是将已有的制度元素重组,才产生新的制度。

(1)访谈设计遵循半结构化原则,围绕“安全-开放”螺旋三个分析维度,提供充分叙事空间以呈现制度演化中的微观机制与行动者逻辑。访谈内容均经受访者知情同意,关键信息已做匿名化处理。为增强研究信度,本文采用三角验证策略,将政策文本、访谈数据和实地观察进行交叉比对,确保关键发现至少获得两种独立数据来源支持。

(2)亚历山大·乔治(Alexander L.George)等在其著作《社会科学中的案例研究和理论发展》(Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences,2005)中将过程追踪方法界定为在案例内部追踪因果过程的操作和步骤,德里克·比奇(Derek Beach)等在《过程追踪方法:基础与指南》(Process-Tracing Methods:Foundations and Guidelines,2019)中进一步将此方法划分为理论检验型、理论建构型和解释结果型三种变体。

基本信息:

DOI:10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202606.0091

中图分类号:D631

引用信息:

[1]姜秀敏,侯佳彤.“安全-开放”螺旋:海南自贸港综合安全治理体系的演化逻辑与制度创新[J].海南大学学报(社会科学版)().DOI:10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202606.0091.

基金信息:

国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(24FGJB001)

发布时间:

2026-09-02

出版时间:

2026-09-02

网络发布时间:

2026-09-02

文档文件

检 索 高级检索