| 153 | 0 | 116 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
在复杂多变的市场环境下，双源采购与内部碳交易已成为供应链管理中的关键战略选择与主要决策。本文考虑了一条由两家供应商与一家制造商组成的二级供应链。研究了当外部碳市场存在时，制造商与一家或同时与两家供应商进行内部碳交易的四种情形，并分析了企业采购与减排决策以及内外部碳价、减排压力等因素对供应链决策的影响。结果表明，制造商始终倾向于进行内部碳交易，当其减排压力较大时，采取内部碳交易模式使得制造商在两家供应商处的采购量均变大，而供应商是否接受制造商的内部碳交易提议则会根据自身减排难度来决定。与此同时，采取内部碳交易模式并不能够使得环境效益始终占优，而是受到市场潜在规模的影响。本研究实现了企业减排路径的优化，分析了碳交易与产品采购之间的作用关系，并为企业践行可持续发展要求以及政府参与碳市场调控提供了新的见解与参考。
Abstract：Under the complex and dynamic market environment, dual-source procurement and internal carbon trading(ICT) have become critical strategic choices and major decisions in supply chain management. This paper considers a two-tier supply chain consisting of two suppliers and one manufacturer. This study examines four scenarios in which a manufacturer engages in ICT with one or both of its two suppliers, alongside the existence of an external carbon market. The study analyzes the procurement and emission reduction decisions of the firms, as well as the impacts of internal and external carbon prices, emission reduction pressure, and other factors on supply chain decisions. The results show that the manufacturer always prefers to conduct ICT. When facing higher emission reduction pressure, adopting the ICT model leads the manufacturer to increase procurement from both suppliers. Whether suppliers accept the manufacturer's ICT proposal depends on their respective emission reduction difficulties. Meanwhile, implementing the ICT model does not always yield superior environmental benefits, but is influenced by the potential market scale. This research optimizes corporate emission reduction pathways, examines the interaction between carbon trading and product procurement, and offers novel insights and references for enterprises to fulfill sustainability requirements as well as for governmental regulation of the carbon market.
[1]宋寒,祝静,代应.碳交易市场不完善下供应链企业间剩余碳排放配额共享机制[J].计算机集成制造系统,2016,22(09):2217-2226.
[2]李剑,苏秦,马俐.碳排放约束下供应链的碳交易模型研究[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(4):54-62.
[3]张令荣,王健,彭博.内外部碳配额交易路径下供应链减排决策研究[J].中国管理科学,2020,28(11):145-154.
[4]王传生,李晓帆.大型企业内部碳交易模型设计[J].现代商业,2014,(21):231-234.
[5]HAN B, ZHANG Y, WANG S, et al. The efficient and stable planning for interrupted supply chain with dual-sourcing strategy:a robust optimization approach considering decision maker's risk attitude[J]. Omega, 2023, 115:102775.
[6]王军进,许淞俊,刘家国.面对不确定性供应中断风险的制造商采购策略研究[J].中国管理科学,2024,32(12):269-277.
[7]李晓超,林国龙.供应不确定条件下双源与柔性采购联合决策[J].中国流通经济,2016,30(10):38-47.
[8]景熠,刘芹芹,周林.突发事件影响下考虑供应中断风险和消费者偏好的制造商采购策略研究[J].中国管理科学,2026,34(3):93-103.
[9]谢霞,戴宾,曹乐艺.双源采购还是单源采购:责任供应链下的战略采购模式分析[J].管理工程学报,2021,35(06):194-207.
[10]ZHANG W, HUA Z S, BENJAAFAR S. Optimal inventory control with heterogeneous suppliers[J]. Production and operations management, 2012, 21(3):564-575.
[11]BANSAL S, TRANSCHEL S. Managing supply risk for vertically differentiated co-products. Production and operations management, 2014, 23(9):1577-1598
[12]FAN X, CHEN K, CHEN Y J. Is price commitment a better solution to control carbon emissions and promote technology investment?[J]. Management science, 2023, 69(1):325-341.
[13]YENIPAZARLI A.Managing new and remanufactured products to mitigate environmental damage under emissions regulation[J].European journal of operational research, 2016, 249(1):117-130.
[14]CAI J, JIANG F. Decision models of pricing and carbon emission reduction for low-carbon supply chain under cap-andtrade regulation[J]. International journal of production economics, 2023, 264:108964.
[15]夏西强,朱庆华,武晓晴.政府碳税与补贴政策对独立再制造模式的影响[J].系统工程学报,2024,39(04):629-640.
[16]张倩.考虑稳定性因素的绿色供应链参与行为演化博弈分析[J].系统工程学报,2025,40(04):610-622.
[17]GAO F, SOUZA G C. Carbon offsetting with eco-conscious consumers[J]. Management science, 2022, 68(11):7879-7897.
[18]CAI J, JIANG F. Decision models of pricing and carbon emission reduction for low-carbon supply chain under cap-andtrade regulation[J]. International journal of production economics, 2023, 264:108964.
[19]林强,赵震铮,霍宝锋,等.考虑碳交易政策的零售商合作减排策略:融资减排或技术减排[J].系统工程理论与实践,2024,44(03):986-1005.
[20]张云丰,尚钱龙,龚本刚,等.碳标签制度下三级供应链定价与碳减排决策[J].系统工程学报,2022,37(02):242-262.
[21]YAO Q, SHAO L. Research on emission reduction strategies of building materials manufacturers and real estate developers in the context of carbon trading[J]. Frontiers in environmental science, 2022, 10:848260.
[22]WANG M, ZHAO L, HERTY M. Modelling carbon trading and refrigerated logistics services within a fresh food supply chain under carbon cap-and-trade regulation[J].International journal of production research, 2018(5):1-19.
[23]WANG J M. Research on company's internal carbon emission trading market[J].China population, resources and environment, 2011,(8):128-133.
[24]杜丽娟,杜美卿,任伟等.大型企业内部碳交易价格机制研究[J].价格理论与实践,2019,(09):46-49.
[25]邓万江,马士华,关旭.碳交易背景下存在顾客环保偏好的双企业竞争策略研究[J].中国管理科学,2017,25(12):17-26.
[26]NIU B, WANG Y, GUO P. Equilibrium pricing sequence in a co-opetitive supply chain with the ODM as a downstream rival of its OEM[J]. Omega, 2015, 57:249-270.
[27]冯颖,汪梦园,张炎治,等.制造商承担社会责任的绿色供应链政府补贴机制[J].管理工程学报,2022,36(06):156-167.
[28]楼高翔,裘银浩,夏海洋.考虑研发努力与营销投入的绿色供应链协调[J].工业工程与管理,2020,25(04):131-139.
[29]RANJAN A, JHA J K. Pricing and coordination strategies of a dual-channel supply chain considering green quality and sales effort[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2019, 218:409-424.
[30]PUN H, GHAMAT S. Cap-and-trade under a dual-channel setting in the presence of information asymmetry[J]. European journal of operational research, 2025, 322(2):500-510.
[31]YANG L, WANG G, KE C. Remanufacturing and promotion in dual-channel supply chains under cap-and-trade regulation[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2018, 204:939-957.
[32]王道平,殷悦,朱梦影.基于不同碳配额交易路径的供应链减排决策研究[J].运筹与管理,2024,33(05):35-41.
[33]ZHU C, MA J. Optimal decisions in two-echelon supply chain under hybrid carbon regulations:The perspective of inner carbon trading[J]. Computers&industrial engineering, 2022, 173:108699.
基本信息:
DOI：10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202601.0070
中图分类号:X322;F832.5;F274
引用信息:
[1]赵达,李海辰,官雨娴.碳交易背景下供应链双源采购与减排决策研究[J].海南大学学报(社会科学版)().DOI:10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202601.0070.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金项目(72562015); 海南省研究生创新科研课题(Qhys2024-301)
2026-09-02
2026-09-02
2026-09-02