nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
数字时代科技治理的逻辑转向与实践路径——基于数字生态文明建设的视角
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金青年项目(25CKS126)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202608.0351
发布时间: 2026-09-18
出版时间: 2026-09-18
网络发布时间: 2026-09-18
移动端阅读
摘要:

数字技术的全域渗透使其生态风险呈现全程衍生、动态叠加、连锁蔓延等新特征,传统科技治理固守工业时代形成的技术至上论、动力机制与末端模式,治理实践陷入价值悬置、边界失守与时序错配的三重困境。从理论上讲,数字时代科技治理的逻辑转向应沿三条轴线展开:在价值取向上,从技术理性主导转向生态价值引领;在动力机制上,从外部约束转向内部驱动;在治理模式上,从末端治理转向全过程治理。从实践上看,应建立生态影响的分级前置审查制度、动态适配的适应性监管机制,始终遵循系统观念与协同共治的方法论原则,以实现数字技术创新与生态文明建设的深层协同。

Abstract:

The pervasive penetration of digital technology has given rise to new characteristics in ecological risks, such as risks arising throughout the entire process, dynamically accumulating, and spreading in a chain reaction. Traditional science and technology governance remains entrenched in the techno-centrism, driving mechanisms, and end-of-pipe models formed during the Industrial Age, causing governance practices to fall into a threefold dilemma of suspended values, blurred boundaries, and chronological mismatches. Theoretically, the logical shift in science and technology governance in the digital age should unfold along three axes. In terms of value orientation, a shift can be made from technology-driven rationality to ecological value-led governance; in terms of driving mechanisms, a shift can be made from external constraints to internal drivers; and in terms of governance models, a shift can be made from end-of-pipe governance to full-process governance. In practice, a tiered, ex ante review system for ecological impacts and a dynamically adaptive regulatory mechanism should be established, consistently adhering to the methodological principles of systems thinking and collaborative governance to achieve deep synergy between digital technological innovation and the construction of an ecological civilization.

参考文献

[1]宁悦.习近平生态文明思想视域下的数字生态文明治理范式变革[J].马克思主义研究,2026(5):29-41.

[2]方青,许悦.生成式人工智能驱动下的生态文明建设:技术赋能与范式创新[J].科技管理研究,2026(12):243-250.

[3]孙博文,王树勋.数字生态文明:数智时代破解“杰文斯悖论”的中国智慧与中国方案[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2026(4):1-10.

[4]刘国菊.数字生态文明建设的内在逻辑与实践路径[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2023(18):87-91.

[5]贝克.风险社会[M].何博闻,译.南京:译林出版社,2004:58-65.

[6]约纳斯.技术、医学与伦理学:责任原理的实践[M].张荣,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2008:25.

[7]马尔库塞.单向度的人:发达工业社会意识形态研究[M].刘继,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2008:126.

[8]马克思恩格斯文集:第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009:723.

[9]芬伯格.技术批判理论[M].韩连庆,曹观法,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2005:16.

[10]佟林杰,张明欣.数字形式主义的生成逻辑、制度困境及消解策略[J].理论导刊,2022(4):65-71+92.

[11]李思然,何颖.科技向善与伦理在先:科技伦理治理体系的构建路径探析[J].中国行政管理,2025(8):47-58.

[12]史亚东.公众环境参与的多重理论源流探析与融合[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2019(6):51-60.

基本信息:

DOI:10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202608.0351

中图分类号:F49;X321

引用信息:

[1]陈鹏.数字时代科技治理的逻辑转向与实践路径——基于数字生态文明建设的视角[J].海南大学学报(社会科学版)().DOI:10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202608.0351.

基金信息:

国家社会科学基金青年项目(25CKS126)

发布时间:

2026-09-18

出版时间:

2026-09-18

网络发布时间:

2026-09-18

检 索 高级检索