海南大学学报(社会科学版)

知识产权“碰瓷式维权”始于权利人的维权需要，而综合治理的底层逻辑是正当维权嬗变为权利滥用，弱化了知识产权激励创新和保护权利的制度效能。正当维权嬗变为权利滥用过程中，基于权利多元关系、行为竞合关系、利益失衡关系，分别表现为转化、交织、失衡耦合形态，存在维权依据合法性、维权主观正当性、维权方式合理性、维权结果违法性的争议。域外治理经验表明，可以参鉴滥用行为类型识别机制、合理分配诉讼成本、健全行政程序规制。耦合逻辑下“碰瓷式维权”的综合治理，在思路上应当从“非此即彼”转向“辩证统一”，从“多方衡平”转向“明确规制”，从“领域治理”转向“系统治理”；在主体上应当形成司法裁判、行政监管、平台治理和社会协同的多元共治；在机制上应当针对转化耦合、交织耦合、失衡耦合三种形态，分别建立健全权利取得分级审查、权利行使强制信息披露、诉讼诚信档案建设和行政失信惩戒的联动机制，并面对滥诉和恶意投诉，辅助算法的智能识别提高处理效率。

"Patent troll-style rights enforcement" originates from rights holders' need to protect their rights, while the underlying logic of comprehensive treatment is that legitimate rights enforcement has transformed into rights abuse, weakening the institutional efficacy of intellectual property in incentivizing innovation and protecting rights. In the process whereby legitimate rights enforcement transforms into rights abuse, based on the multiple relations among rights, the concurrence of conducts, and the imbalance of interests, three coupled forms emerge respectively: transformation, interweaving, and imbalance, giving rise to disputes concerning the legitimacy of the basis for enforcement, the justifiability of the subjective intent underlying enforcement, the reasonableness of enforcement methods, and the illegality of enforcement outcomes. Extraterritorial governance experience shows that it is possible to draw on mechanisms for identifying types of abusive conduct, rationally allocating litigation costs, and improving administrative procedural regulation. Under the logic of coupling, the comprehensive treatment of "patent troll-style rights enforcement" should, in terms of approach, shift from "either/or" thinking to "dialectical unity," from "multi-party balancing" to "explicit regulation, " and from "field-specific governance" to "systematic governance"; in terms of actors, it should form a pluralistic co-governance framework involving judicial adjudication, administrative supervision, platform governance, and social coordination; and in terms of mechanisms, it should, in response to the three coupled forms of transformation, interweaving, and imbalance, establish and improve linked mechanisms for hierarchical review of rights acquisition, mandatory information disclosure in rights enforcement, construction of litigation integrity archives, and administrative punishment for bad-faith conduct, while employing algorithmic intelligent identification as a supplementary means to improve processing efficiency in the face of abusive litigation and malicious complaints.